The Raspberry Pi Foundation isn't just a company, but also a charity. Let us start with those who manufacture the product. Why would anyone in their right mind choose the Raspberry Pi Pico W? There are reasons. It has faster cores and, if bought from a Chinese marketplace, costs about half as much. Why you still might want a Raspberry Pi Pico WĪs you might have gathered so far, the ESP32 seems the better all-round deal. Tensilica Xtensa LX106 Single-core at 80 MHzġThe ESP32 18 channels ADC, when using Wi-Fi, only 6 are available. Tensilica Xtensa LX6 Dual-Core at 240 MHz + ultra low power (ULP) co-processor For example, the LOLIN D1 mini does not have the same amount of available pins as the NodeMCU, despite both using the same ESP8266 microcontroller. Keep in mind that the features of ESP32 and ESP8266 boards greatly vary, depending on the model you pick. Comparing the Raspberry Pi Pico W to the ESP32 and ESP8266īelow is a comparison of the Raspberry Pi Pico W, the NodeMCU ESP32, and NodeMCU ESP8266. It should give you significantly better results than the ageing ESP8266, though. In terms of performance, the Raspberry Pi Pico W can't quite compete with the ESP32. Once the Raspberry Pi Pico W is fully supported by ESPHome, you might be wondering whether you should use it for your next project, instead of an ESP32. Should you choose the Raspberry Pi Pico W instead of the ESP32? However, the current firmware does not enable this functionality, and there aren't any promises that it ever will. The above-mentioned Arduino Nano RP2040 Connect uses a u-blox NINA Wi-Fi and Bluetooth module, whereas the Pico W makes use of an Infineon CYW43439.Īlso of note for ESPHome users is that the Raspberry Pi Pico W's chip supports the relatively new Bluetooth 5.2 and Bluetooth LE - just as an ESP32 would. I'm assuming that the ESPHome team is working on primarily integrating the Raspberry Pi Pico W, and not every variant available.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |